Tools

LEADER 03220cam 2200517 a 4500

001 ocn317384237;

003 OCoLC;

005 20141212041749.0;

008 090318s2009 dcuab b f000 0 eng ;

010 a| 2009397119;

020 a| 9780160827389;

020 a| 0160827388;

035 a| (Sirsi) o317384237;

035 a| (OCoLC)317384237;

037 a| 052-070-07548-1b| GPO;

043 a| n-us---a| e------;

049 a| ERE#;

050 00 a| UG745.E85b| O68 2009;

074 a| 1005-C;

086 0 a| Y 10.2:M 69/2;

245 00 a| Options for deploying missile defenses in Europe.;

260 a| Washington, DC :b| Congress of the United States, Congressional Budget Office :b| For sale by the Supt. of Docs., U.S. G.P.O.,c| [2009];

300 a| xxii, 57 pages :b| color illustrations, color maps ;c| 28 cm.;

336 a| text2| rdacontent;

337 a| unmediated2| rdamedia;

338 a| volume2| rdacarrier;

490 1 a| A CBO study;

500 a| "February 2009.";

504 a| Includes bibliographical references.;

505 0 a| Ballistic missiles: threats and defenses. Current and potential missile threats from Iran ; The debate about ballistic missile defenses ; Technical challenges to ballistic missile defenses ; Current and planned components of U.S. missile defenses -- Options for missile defenses in Europe. Existing midcourse-phase defenses ; Four alternatives for missile defenses in Europe ; Estimated costs of the options -- Defense capabilities of alternative midcourse-phase missile defenses. The U.S.-based GMD Block 3.0 System ; A potential crisis-response defense ; CBO's four options for deploying standing missile defenses in Europe -- Ballistic missile basics -- Analytic methods and sensitivity of the results to changes in assumptions.;

520 a| Study examines the cost and potential defensive capability of the proposed European Ground-Based Midcourse Defense system. Also explores alternative ways to provide some or all of the intended capabilities of that system. Alternatives considered include deploying sea-based interceptors around Europe or mobile land-based interceptors at existing U.S. bases in Europe. In addition, defensive capability that would be available if no dedicated missile defenses were fielded in Europe is examined.;

530 a| Also available via Internet from the CBO web site. Address as of 4/14/2009: http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/100xx/doc10013/02-27-MissileDefense.pdf; current access available via PURL.;

650 0 a| Ballistic missile defensesz| Europe.=| ^A167808;

651 0 a| Europex| Defenses.=| ^A60328;

651 0 a| United Statesx| Defenses.=| ^A24985;

710 1 a| United States.b| Congressional Budget Office.=| ^A5918;

776 0 t| Options for deploying missile defenses in Europeh| xxii, 57 p.w| (OCoLC)311868487;

830 0 a| CBO study.=| ^A428927;

856 41 u| https://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/LPS109556z| View online version;

994 a| C0b| ERE;

938 a| Baker and Taylorb| BTCPn| BK0008380918;

998 a| 1924100;

998 a| u1924100;

596 a| 1;

999 a| Y 10.2:M 69/2w| SUDOCc| 1i| 40372000373030l| JDOSm| JOYNERr| Ys| Yt| JDOSBKu| 4/9/2009x| BOOKz| JFEDDOCSo| .STAFF. 0;

Options for deploying missile defenses in Europe.

Other author	United States. Congressional Budget Office.
Format	Book
Publication Info	Washington, DC : Congress of the United States, Congressional Budget Office : For sale by the Supt. of Docs., U.S. G.P.O., [2009]
Description	xxii, 57 pages : color illustrations, color maps ; 28 cm.
Supplemental Content	View online version
Subjects	Ballistic missile defenses--Europe. Europe--Defenses. United States--Defenses.

Series	A CBO study CBO study. ^A428927
Contents	Ballistic missiles: threats and defenses. Current and potential missile threats from Iran ; The debate about ballistic missile defenses ; Technical challenges to ballistic missile defenses ; Current and planned components of U.S. missile defenses -- Options for missile defenses in Europe. Existing midcourse-phase defenses ; Four alternatives for missile defenses in Europe ; Estimated costs of the options -- Defense capabilities of alternative midcourse-phase missile defenses. The U.S.-based GMD Block 3.0 System ; A potential crisis-response defense ; CBO's four options for deploying standing missile defenses in Europe -- Ballistic missile basics -- Analytic methods and sensitivity of the results to changes in assumptions.
Abstract	Study examines the cost and potential defensive capability of the proposed European Ground-Based Midcourse Defense system. Also explores alternative ways to provide some or all of the intended capabilities of that system. Alternatives considered include deploying sea-based interceptors around Europe or mobile land-based interceptors at existing U.S. bases in Europe. In addition, defensive capability that would be available if no dedicated missile defenses were fielded in Europe is examined.
General note	"February 2009."
Bibliography note	Includes bibliographical references.
Other forms	Also available via Internet from the CBO web site. Address as of 4/14/2009: http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/100xx/doc10013/02-27-MissileDefense.pdf; current access available via PURL.
Issued in other form	Options for deploying missile defenses in Europe xxii, 57 p.
LCCN	2009397119
ISBN	9780160827389
ISBN	0160827388
GPO item number	1005-C
Govt. docs number	Y 10.2:M 69/2
Stock number	052-070-07548-1 GPO

Options for deploying missile defenses in Europe.

Click here for more information about this title