Comparative analysis of cask material from late sixteenth through early nineteenth century shipwrecks / by Kimberly M. Smith.
| Author/creator | Smith, Kimberly M. |
| Other author | Ewen, Charles R., 1956- |
| Other author | East Carolina University. Department of Anthropology. |
| Format | Theses and dissertations |
| Publication Info | [Greenville, N.C.] : East Carolina University, 2009. |
| Description | 271 pages : illustrations (some color), forms, digital, PDF file |
| Supplemental Content | Access via ScholarShip |
| Subjects |
| Summary | This thesis examined cask material, including cask staves, heads, hoops, bungs and other components that casks consist of, recovered from 13 eighteenth century, three nineteenth century, one seventeenth, and two sixteenth century shipwrecks in an effort to discern a pattern in the types of cask material recovered within different types of vessels (e.g. pirate, merchant, and naval). Literature reviews were conducted and numerous archaeological, anthropological, and historical journals; namely, the International Journal for Nautical Archaeology, Historical Archaeology, The Australian Journal of Historical Archaeology were consulted. Published and unpublished theses and dissertations, proceedings from maritime and historical archaeological conferences for reports on shipwrecks containing cask material, and Parks Canada and National Park Service publications were also reviewed. Cask materials were studied and compared using bar graphs, histograms, and pie charts. Several potential patterns were identified, but none were definitive. This was not because they may not exist, but rather due to the inconsistent reporting methods creating a lack of available data to conduct comparative analysis. The inconsistent nature of the data obtained influenced the need to establish a standard reporting method. The final product of this research was the introduction of a standard reporting method and associated terminology and reporting forms. While the data set was too inconsistent to make conclusive statements, this type of comparative analysis should begin to establish a framework for the interpretation of cask materials from future excavations. |
| General note | Presented to the faculty of the Department of Anthropology. |
| General note | Advisor: Charles R. Ewen. |
| General note | Title from PDF t.p. (viewed May 25, 2010). |
| Dissertation note | M.A. East Carolina University 2009. |
| Bibliography note | Includes bibliographical references. |
| Technical details | System requirements: Adobe Reader. |
| Technical details | Mode of access: World Wide Web. |