Tools

LEADER 03681nam 2200709Ia 4500

001 ocm64440513;

003 OCoLC;

005 20141212052107.0;

006 m d f ;

007 cr mn|||||||||;

008 080512s2005 mdua sb f000 0 eng d;

027 a| ARL-TR-3560;

029 0 a| DTICEb| ADA437236;

035 a| (Sirsi) o64440513;

035 a| (OCoLC)64440513;

040 a| DTICEc| DTICEd| GPOd| UtOrBLW;

049 a| ERE#;

074 a| 0324-A-01 (online);

086 0 a| D 101.133:3560;

100 1 a| Glumm, Monica M.=| ^A1033189;

245 10 a| Effects of visual and auditory cues about threat location on target acquisition and attention to auditory communications /c| Monica M. Glumm, Kathy L. Kehring, and Timothy L. White.;

260 a| Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD :b| U.S. Army Research Laboratory,c| [2005];

300 a| 1 online resource (viii, 33 pages) :b| illustrations.;

336 a| text2| rdacontent;

337 a| computer2| rdamedia;

338 a| online resource2| rdacarrier;

490 1 a| ARL-TR ;v| 3560;

500 a| Title from title screen (viewed May 25, 2010).;

500 a| "August 2005.";

500 a| The original document contains color images. Project no. 62716AH70.;

504 a| Includes bibliographical references (p. 21-22).;

506 a| APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE.;

520 a| This study examined the effects of visual, spatial language and three-dimensional (3-D) audio cues about target location on target acquisition performance and the recall of information contained in concurrent radio communications. Two baseline conditions were also included in the analysis: no cues (Baseline 1) and target presence cues only (Baseline 2). In modes in which target location cues were provided, 100% of the targets presented were acquired, as compared to 94% in Baseline 1 and 95% in Baseline 2. On average, targets were acquired 1.4 seconds faster in the visual, spatial language, audio modes than in the baseline conditions, with times in the visual and 3-D audio modes being 1 second faster than those in spatial language. Overall workload scores were lower in the 3-D audio mode than in all other conditions except the visual mode. Less information (23%) was recalled from auditory communications in Baseline 1 than in the other four conditions where attention could be directed to communications between target presentations.;

536 f| 62716AH70.;

650 0 a| Target acquisition.=| ^A118544;

650 0 a| Computer simulation.=| ^A72820;

650 17 a| Target Direction, Range and Position Finding.2| scgdst;

650 27 a| Acoustics.2| scgdst;

650 27 a| Human Factors Engineering & Man Machine System.2| scgdst;

650 17 a| Target acquisition.2| dtict;

650 17 a| Visual signals.2| dtict;

650 17 a| Auditory signals.2| dtict;

650 17 a| Cues(stimuli)2| dtict;

650 27 a| Position(location)2| dtict;

650 27 a| Detection.2| dtict;

650 27 a| Communication and radio systems.2| dtict;

650 27 a| Speech.2| dtict;

650 27 a| Display systems.2| dtict;

650 27 a| Threats.2| dtict;

653 2 a| SENSORY MODALITIES;

653 2 a| SPATIAL LANGUAGES;

653 2 a| 3-D AUDIO(THREE DIMENSIONAL AUDIO);

700 1 a| Kehring, Kathy L.=| ^A1033190;

700 1 a| White, Timothy L.=| ^A1033188;

710 2 a| U.S. Army Research Laboratory.=| ^A367731;

830 0 a| ARL-TR (Aberdeen Proving Ground, Md.) ; 3560.?| UNAUTHORIZED;

856 40 u| https://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/LPS122501;

949 a| Click on web addressw| ASISh| JOYNER94;

998 a| 2285004;

998 a| u2285004;

596 a| 1;

999 a| CLICK ON WEB ADDRESSw| ASISc| 1i| 2285004-1001l| JNETm| JOYNERr| Ys| Yt| JNE1DOu| 7/22/2010x| EDOCUMENTz| JERESOURCE;

Effects of visual and auditory cues about threat location on target acquisition and attention to auditory communications / Monica M. Glumm, Kathy L. Kehring, and Timothy L. White.

Author/creator	Glumm, Monica M.
Other author	Kehring, Kathy L.
Other author	White, Timothy L.
Other author	U.S. Army Research Laboratory.
Format	Electronic
Publication Info	Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD : U.S. Army Research Laboratory, [2005]
Description	1 online resource (viii, 33 pages) : illustrations.
Supplemental Content	https://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/LPS122501
Subjects	Target acquisition. Computer simulation.

Series	ARL-TR ; 3560 ARL-TR (Aberdeen Proving Ground, Md.) ; 3560. UNAUTHORIZED
Abstract	This study examined the effects of visual, spatial language and three-dimensional (3-D) audio cues about target location on target acquisition performance and the recall of information contained in concurrent radio communications. Two baseline conditions were also included in the analysis: no cues (Baseline 1) and target presence cues only (Baseline 2). In modes in which target location cues were provided, 100% of the targets presented were acquired, as compared to 94% in Baseline 1 and 95% in Baseline 2. On average, targets were acquired 1.4 seconds faster in the visual, spatial language, audio modes than in the baseline conditions, with times in the visual and 3-D audio modes being 1 second faster than those in spatial language. Overall workload scores were lower in the 3-D audio mode than in all other conditions except the visual mode. Less information (23%) was recalled from auditory communications in Baseline 1 than in the other four conditions where attention could be directed to communications between target presentations.
General note	Title from title screen (viewed May 25, 2010).
General note	"August 2005."
General note	The original document contains color images. Project no. 62716AH70.
Bibliography note	Includes bibliographical references (p. 21-22).
Access restriction	APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE.
Funding information	62716AH70.
Technical rpt#	ARL-TR-3560
GPO item number	0324-A-01 (online)
Govt. docs number	D 101.133:3560

Availability

Library	Location	Call Number	Status	Item Actions
	Electronic Resources	Access Content Online	✔ Available

Effects of visual and auditory cues about threat location on target acquisition and attention to auditory communications / Monica M. Glumm, Kathy L. Kehring, and Timothy L. White.

Click here for more information about this title

Availability