Tools

LEADER 02815nam 2200529La 4500

001 ocn600233411;

003 OCoLC;

005 20141212052359.0;

006 m d f ;

007 cr mn|||||||||;

008 100405s2010 cou s f000 0 eng d;

035 a| (Sirsi) o600233411;

035 a| (OCoLC)600233411;

040 a| SOEc| SOEd| GPOd| UtOrBLW;

043 a| n-us---;

049 a| ERE#;

074 a| 0430-P-04 (online);

086 0 a| E 9.17:NREL/CP-500-46726;

088 a| NREL/CP-500-46726;

100 1 a| Jonkman, J. M.q| (Jason Mark)=| ^A783618;

245 12 a| A quantitative comparison of the responses of three floating platforms /c| J. Jonkman [and] D. Matha.;

256 a| Electronic data (1 PDF file : 667 Kb).;

260 a| Golden, CO :b| National Renewable Energy Laboratory,c| 2010.;

300 a| 1 online resource (iii, 15 pages);

336 a| text2| rdacontent;

337 a| computer2| rdamedia;

338 a| online resource2| rdacarrier;

490 1 a| Conference paper ;v| NREL/CP-500-46726;

500 a| Title from title screen (viewed April 5, 2010).;

500 a| "March 2010.";

500 a| "Presented at European Offshore Wind 2009 Conference and Exhibition, Stockholm, Sweden, September 14-16, 2009.";

504 a| Includes bibliographical references.;

520 3 a| This report presents a comprehensive dynamic-response analysis of three offshore floating wind turbine concepts. Models were composed of one 5-MW turbine supported on land and three 5-MW turbines located offshore on a tension leg platform, a spar buoy, and a barge. A loads and stability analysis adhering to the procedures of international design standards was performed for each model using the fully coupled time-domain aero-hydro-servo-elastic design code FAST with AeroDyn and HydroDyn. The concepts are compared based on the calculated ultimate loads, fatigue loads, and instabilities. The results of this analysis will help resolve the fundamental design trade-offs between the floating-system concepts.;

538 a| Full text available via Internet in .pdf format. Adobe Acrobat Reader required.;

650 0 a| Wind turbinesx| Research.=| ^A429386;

650 0 a| Offshore structuresx| Testing.=| ^A90597;

650 0 a| FAST (Computer program)?| UNAUTHORIZED;

700 1 a| Matha, Denis.=| ^A1043471;

710 2 a| National Renewable Energy Laboratory (U.S.)=| ^A367790;

710 2 a| Universität Stuttgart.=| ^A1020049;

830 0 a| Conference paper (National Renewable Energy Laboratory (U.S.)) ;v| NREL/CP-500-46726.=| ^A755847;

856 40 u| https://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/LPS123972;

949 a| Click on web addressw| ASISh| JOYNER94;

998 a| 2295051;

998 a| u2295051;

596 a| 1;

999 a| CLICK ON WEB ADDRESSw| ASISc| 1i| 2295051-1001l| JNETm| JOYNERr| Ys| Yt| JNE1DOu| 8/18/2010x| EDOCUMENTz| JERESOURCE;

A quantitative comparison of the responses of three floating platforms / J. Jonkman [and] D. Matha.

Author/creator	Jonkman, J. M.
Other author	Matha, Denis.
Other author	National Renewable Energy Laboratory (U.S.)
Other author	Universität Stuttgart.
Format	Electronic
Publication Info	Golden, CO : National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2010.
Description	1 online resource (iii, 15 pages)
Supplemental Content	https://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/LPS123972
Subjects	Wind turbines--Research. Offshore structures--Testing. FAST (Computer program)

Data characteristics	Electronic data (1 PDF file : 667 Kb).
Series	Conference paper ; NREL/CP-500-46726 Conference paper (National Renewable Energy Laboratory (U.S.)) ; NREL/CP-500-46726. ^A755847
Summary	This report presents a comprehensive dynamic-response analysis of three offshore floating wind turbine concepts. Models were composed of one 5-MW turbine supported on land and three 5-MW turbines located offshore on a tension leg platform, a spar buoy, and a barge. A loads and stability analysis adhering to the procedures of international design standards was performed for each model using the fully coupled time-domain aero-hydro-servo-elastic design code FAST with AeroDyn and HydroDyn. The concepts are compared based on the calculated ultimate loads, fatigue loads, and instabilities. The results of this analysis will help resolve the fundamental design trade-offs between the floating-system concepts.
General note	Title from title screen (viewed April 5, 2010).
General note	"March 2010."
General note	"Presented at European Offshore Wind 2009 Conference and Exhibition, Stockholm, Sweden, September 14-16, 2009."
Bibliography note	Includes bibliographical references.
Technical details	Full text available via Internet in .pdf format. Adobe Acrobat Reader required.
Technical rpt number	NREL/CP-500-46726
GPO item number	0430-P-04 (online)
Govt. docs number	E 9.17:NREL/CP-500-46726

Availability

Library	Location	Call Number	Status	Item Actions
	Electronic Resources	Access Content Online	✔ Available

A quantitative comparison of the responses of three floating platforms / J. Jonkman [and] D. Matha.

Click here for more information about this title

Availability