Use of Oral Language General Outcome Measures to Describe Children According to Language Status / Alicia Strein.

Author/creator Strein, Alicia
Other author Ball, Laura J.
Other author East Carolina University. Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders.
Format Theses and dissertations
Publication Info[Greenville, N.C.] : East Carolina University, 2011.
Description51 pages : digital, PDF file.
Supplemental ContentAccess via ScholarShip
Subjects

SeriesECU College of Allied Health Sciences thesis
ECU College of Allied Health Sciences thesis. UNAUTHORIZED
Summary The purpose of the study was to determine if short language samples can effectively distinguish children with language impairments from those who are typically developing. Four elicitation methods (individual picture descriptions, multi-scene picture description, narrative, and interview) were administered to 14 typically developing children and 3 children with language impairments in Chapel Hill, NC as well as to 16 typically developing children in Greenville, NC. Each task was administered 3 times and lasted 1 minute. All samples were collected and transcribed by the principal investigator and then analyzed using 5 general language sample measures (Number of Total Words, Number of Different Words, Number of Total Utterances, Mean Length of Utterance, Errors/Omissions). Intercorrelations between the elicitation tasks were found for each measure and then the effect size was determined comparing the typically developing children and children with language impairments in Chapel Hill, NC. Significant correlations were observed between most measures. A review of the correlation strength revealed the strongest relationships between the descriptions of individual pictures and multi-scene picture description tasks. Notable differences were observed between children with language impairments and typically developing children. The largest group differences were observed for the Number of Different Words measure. The results suggest that the short language samples produce meaningful information and are clinically feasible.
General notePresented to the faculty of the Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders.
General noteAdvisor: Laura J. Ball.
General noteTitle from PDF t.p. (viewed August 19, 2011).
Dissertation noteM.S. East Carolina University 2011.
Bibliography noteIncludes bibliographical references.
Technical detailsSystem requirements: Adobe Reader.
Technical detailsMode of access: World Wide Web.

Availability

Library Location Call Number Status Item Actions
Electronic Resources Access Content Online ✔ Available