Tools

LEADER 02385cam 2200481Ia 4500

001 ocn664815725;

003 OCoLC;

005 20110720100341.0;

006 m d f ;

007 cr m||||||||||;

008 100922s2010 dcuab ob f000 0 eng d;

040 a| AWCc| AWCd| GPOd| MvI;

043 a| n-us---;

049 a| ERE#;

074 a| 0545-A-04 (online);

086 0 a| GA 1.41:GAO-10-745 R;

088 a| GAO-10-745 R;

100 1 a| Pendleton, John.?| UNAUTHORIZED;

245 10 a| Defense planning :b| DOD needs to review the costs and benefits of basing alternatives for Army forces in Europe /c| [John Pendleton].;

246 3 a| Defense planning :b| Department of Defense needs to review the costs and benefits of basing alternatives for Army forces in Europe;

246 30 a| DOD needs to review the costs and benefits of basing alternatives for Army forces in Europe;

260 a| Washington, DC :b| U.S. Govt. Accountability Office,c| [2010];

300 a| 1 online resource (18 p.) :b| ill., map;

336 a| textb| txt2| rdacontent;

337 a| computerb| c2| rdamedia;

338 a| online resourceb| cr2| rdacarrier;

500 a| Title from PDF caption (GAO, viewed Sept. 22, 2010).;

500 a| "September 13, 2010.";

504 a| Includes bibliographical references.;

505 0 a| Scope and methodology -- Summary -- Background -- Future plans for Army forces in Europe are uncertain, but costs are likely to be higher than earlier Army estimates -- Inconsistent processes to develop facility requirements hampers validation of facility needs -- Conclusions.;

500 a| "GAO-10-745R.";

500 a| GPO Cataloging Record Distribution Program (CRDP).;

610 10 a| United States.b| Department of Defensex| Appropriations and expenditures.=| ^A112965;

610 10 a| United States.b| Armyx| Appropriations and expenditures.=| ^A426149;

650 0 a| Military bases, Americanz| Foreign countriesx| Costs.=| ^A139572;

650 0 a| Military planningz| United States.=| ^A142956;

710 1 a| United States.b| Government Accountability Office.=| ^A580995;

856 40 u| https://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/gpo8720;

949 a| Click on web addressw| asish| joyner94;

596 a| 1;

998 a| 2530210;

999 a| CLICK ON WEB ADDRESSw| ASISc| 1i| 2530210-1001l| JNETm| JOYNERr| Ys| Yt| JNE1DOu| 8/23/2011x| EDOCUMENTz| JERESOURCE;

Defense planning : DOD needs to review the costs and benefits of basing alternatives for Army forces in Europe / [John Pendleton].

Author/creator	Pendleton, John
Other author	United States. Government Accountability Office.
Format	Electronic
Publication Info	Washington, DC : U.S. Govt. Accountability Office, [2010]
Description	1 online resource (18 p.) : ill., map
Supplemental Content	https://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/gpo8720
Subjects	United States. Department of Defense--Appropriations and expenditures. United States. Army--Appropriations and expenditures. United States. Army--Barracks and quarters. --Costs. Military bases, American--Foreign countries. --Costs. Military planning--United States.

Variant title	Defense planning : Department of Defense needs to review the costs and benefits of basing alternatives for Army forces in Europe
Portion of title	DOD needs to review the costs and benefits of basing alternatives for Army forces in Europe
Contents	Scope and methodology -- Summary -- Background -- Future plans for Army forces in Europe are uncertain, but costs are likely to be higher than earlier Army estimates -- Inconsistent processes to develop facility requirements hampers validation of facility needs -- Conclusions.
General note	Title from PDF caption (GAO, viewed Sept. 22, 2010).
General note	"September 13, 2010."
General note	"GAO-10-745R."
General note	GPO Cataloging Record Distribution Program (CRDP).
Bibliography note	Includes bibliographical references.
Technical rpt number	GAO-10-745 R
GPO item number	0545-A-04 (online)
Govt. docs number	GA 1.41:GAO-10-745 R

Defense planning : DOD needs to review the costs and benefits of basing alternatives for Army forces in Europe / [John Pendleton].

Click here for more information about this title