Tools

LEADER 03250nam 2200505 i 4500

001 ssj0002069267;

003 WaSeSS;

005 20211012081143.0;

006 m d ;

007 cr n ;

008 180123s2018 ne sb 000 0 eng d;

010 a| 2018932430;

020 a| 9789004366480 (pbk.);

020 a| 9004366482 (pbk.);

020 z| 9789004366497 (ebk.);

020 z| 9004366490 (ebk.);

035 a| (WaSeSS)ssj0002069267;

042 a| lccopycat;

049 a| EREEa| NEHH;

050 00 a| K3830b| .F66 2018;

082 04 a| 341;

100 1 a| Fontanelli, Filippo.?| UNAUTHORIZED;

245 10 a| Jurisdiction and admissibility in investment arbitrationh| [electronic resource] :b| the practice and the theory /c| by Filippo Fontanelli.;

260 a| Leiden ;a| Boston, MA :b| Brill,c| [2018];

300 a| vi, 193 pages ;c| 24 cm.;

490 1 a| Brill research perspectives. International investment law and arbitration.;

504 a| Includes bibliographical references (pages 171-193).;

506 a| Available only to authorized users.;

520 8 a| Filippo Fontanelli offers an analysis of the subject for practitioners and scholars. The author undertakes two converging studies: first, the practice of investment tribunals is surveyed to provide a representative overview of how jurisdiction and admissibility operate in arbitration proceedings. Second, these concepts are studied in the wider framework of public international law litigation, in the attempt to solve the definitional issues, or at least trace them back to their theoretical background.0The analysis shows that the confusion prevailing in investment arbitration is largely a legacy of the comparable confusion that affects the notions of jurisdiction and admissibility in all kinds of dispute settlement under international law. Whilst the confusion is often irrelevant in the practice, some instances arise where it affects the outcome of the proceedings. The essay discusses some of these instances and recommends adopting a novel approach, which hinges on judicial discretion as the critical element of admissibility.;

538 a| Mode of access: World Wide Web;

650 0 a| Investments, Foreignx| Law and legislation.=| ^A146725;

650 0 a| International commercial arbitration.=| ^A213785;

655 0 a| Electronic books.=| ^A491897;

830 0 a| Brill research perspectives.p| International investment law and arbitration.?| UNAUTHORIZED;

856 40 z| Full text available from Ebook Central - Academic Completeu| https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/eastcarolina/detail.action?docID=5449608;

947 a| (OCoLC)on1035833679;

949 a| CLICK ON WEB ADDRESSw| ASISh| JOYNER188;

949 a| CLICK ON WEB ADDRESSw| ASISh| HSL77;

949 a| CLICK ON WEB ADDRESSw| ASISh| JMUSIC60;

596 a| 1 3 4;

998 a| 5724051;

999 a| CLICK ON WEB ADDRESSw| ASISc| 1i| 5724051-1001l| JNETm| JOYNERr| Ys| Yt| JNESSBKu| 10/14/2021x| EBOOKz| JERESOURCE;

999 a| CLICK ON WEB ADDRESSw| ASISc| 1i| 5724051-2001l| HSLELECm| HSLr| Ys| Yt| HEBKu| 10/14/2021x| EBOOKz| HERESOURCE;

999 a| CLICK ON WEB ADDRESSw| ASISc| 1i| 5724051-3001l| MNETm| JMUSICr| Ys| Yt| MNESSBKu| 10/14/2021x| EBOOKz| JERESOURCE;

Jurisdiction and admissibility in investment arbitration the practice and the theory / by Filippo Fontanelli.

Author/creator	Fontanelli, Filippo
Format	Electronic
Publication Info	Leiden ; Boston, MA : Brill, [2018]
Description	vi, 193 pages ; 24 cm.
Supplemental Content	Full text available from Ebook Central - Academic Complete
Subjects	Investments, Foreign--Law and legislation. International commercial arbitration.

Series	Brill research perspectives. International investment law and arbitration. Brill research perspectives. International investment law and arbitration. UNAUTHORIZED
Summary	Filippo Fontanelli offers an analysis of the subject for practitioners and scholars. The author undertakes two converging studies: first, the practice of investment tribunals is surveyed to provide a representative overview of how jurisdiction and admissibility operate in arbitration proceedings. Second, these concepts are studied in the wider framework of public international law litigation, in the attempt to solve the definitional issues, or at least trace them back to their theoretical background.0The analysis shows that the confusion prevailing in investment arbitration is largely a legacy of the comparable confusion that affects the notions of jurisdiction and admissibility in all kinds of dispute settlement under international law. Whilst the confusion is often irrelevant in the practice, some instances arise where it affects the outcome of the proceedings. The essay discusses some of these instances and recommends adopting a novel approach, which hinges on judicial discretion as the critical element of admissibility.
Bibliography note	Includes bibliographical references (pages 171-193).
Access restriction	Available only to authorized users.
Technical details	Mode of access: World Wide Web
Genre/form	Electronic books.
LCCN	2018932430
ISBN	9789004366480 (pbk.)
ISBN	9004366482 (pbk.)

Availability

Library	Location	Call Number	Status	Item Actions
	Electronic Resources	Access Content Online	✔ Available

Jurisdiction and admissibility in investment arbitration the practice and the theory / by Filippo Fontanelli.

Click here for more information about this title

Availability