Newton's metaphysics essays / Eric Schliesser.

Author/creator Schliesser, Eric, 1971-
Other author Oxford University Press.
Format Electronic
Publication InfoNew York, NY : Oxford University Press, [2021]
Descriptionxv, 306 pages ; 25 cm
Supplemental ContentFull text available from Oxford Scholarship Online
Subjects

Abstract "Not so long ago the scientific revolution was interpreted in terms of competing metaphysically loaded worldviews. For example, Koyré argued, to simplify, that Huygens and Leibniz rejected Newton's physics because they (correctly) thought it incompatible with the mechanical philosophy, which Newton, in turn, rejected as wedded to the wrong kind of hypotheses (see, e.g., Koyré 1950: 262). While not strictly false this picture is misleading because the debate between Huygens and Newton was also centered on empirical arguments, which helped settled it (Schliesser & Smith 1995; Maglo 2003; Schliesser & Smith, forthcoming). In fact, by building on I.B. Cohen's idea of a 'Newtonian style,' and by focusing on Newton's evidential arguments, George Smith (2014) and Bill Harper (2011) revolutionized Newton studies (see also Harper & Smith 1995; for an overview, Smeenk & Schliesser 2013)"-- Provided by publisher.
General noteMinimal Level Cataloging Plus.
Bibliography noteIncludes bibliographical references (pages 261-276) and indexes.
Access restrictionAvailable only to authorized users.
Technical detailsMode of access: World Wide Web
Genre/formElectronic books.
LCCN 2021934271
ISBN9780197567692 (hardback)

Availability

Library Location Call Number Status Item Actions
Electronic Resources Access Content Online ✔ Available