Tools

LEADER 04417cam 2200625 i 4500

001 on1381680657;

003 OCoLC;

005 20240911111725.0;

006 m o d ;

007 cr unu||||||||;

008 230609s2023 ncu obm 000 0 eng d;

035 a| (Sirsi) o1381680657;

035 a| (OCoLC)1381680657;

049 a| EREE;

090 a| HD7261;

100 1 a| Carroll, Anne C.,e| author.?| UNAUTHORIZED;

245 10 a| Employee error :b| the development, validation, and use of a perceived error measure for predicting rumination, burnout, and counterproductive work behaviors /c| by Anne C. Carroll.;

246 3 a| Employee error the development, validation, and use of a perceived error measure for predicting rumination, burnout, and counterproductive work behaviors;

264 1 a| [Greenville, N.C.] :b| [East Carolina University],c| 2023.;

300 a| 1 online resource (93 pages);

336 a| textb| txt2| rdacontent;

337 a| computerb| c2| rdamedia;

338 a| online resourceb| cr2| rdacarrier;

347 a| text fileb| PDFc| 1.092 MB2| rda;

538 a| System requirements: Adobe Reader.;

538 a| Mode of access: World Wide Web.;

502 b| Ph.D.c| East Carolina Universityd| 2023.;

502 a| Presented to the Faculty of the Department of Psychology;

500 a| Advisor: Alexander M. Schoemann;

500 a| Title from PDF t.p. (viewed September 3, 2024).;

520 3 a| Errors are ubiquitous in organizations. Nonetheless, scholarly literature regarding workplace error has largely focused on low-rate catastrophic failures such as the Challenger, Columbia, and Chernobyl accidents. However, errors are not always large in scale nor rare. A general measure of perceived error will be useful for industries that want to understand the relationship between employee error and important job-related outcomes such as rumination, burnout, and counterproductive work behaviors (CWBs). In order to better understand this area, we created and validated a perceived error scale (PES) on a general population of full-time workers. Study one consisted of 440 observations collected via MTurk. An exploratory factor analysis was conducted on 60 percent of the data, and a confirmatory factor analysis was conducted on the remaining sample. Based on psychometric analysis, we determined that perceptions of error were consistent with three established categories of error: individual, latent, and planning errors. Study two utilized a cross-sectional design consisting of 314 observations. SEM was used in this study to test a sequential mediation model. The results suggested that how an individual perceives error may impact rumination, burnout, and CWBs. Both the relationship between latent errors and CWBs were mediated by rumination and burnout. Similarly, the relationship between individual errors and CWB was mediated by rumination and burnout. Planning errors were not related to any of the downstream variables in the model. This is consistent with goal progress theory and the stressor-emotion model of CWB. Notably, the PES factor structure was replicated in the second study adding to its reliability evidence. Future research may consider taking a more longitudinal approach to measuring perceptions of error, burnout, rumination, and CWBs.;

504 a| Includes bibliographical references.;

650 0 a| Industrial hygiene.=| ^A1455;

650 0 a| Burn out (Psychology)x| Prevention.=| ^A1037127;

650 0 a| Organizational behavior.=| ^A5516;

653 a| CWB;

653 a| Counterproductive work behaviors;

653 a| stressor-emotion model of CWB;

653 a| rumination;

653 a| medical errors;

653 a| errors;

653 a| perception of error;

653 a| perceived error scale;

653 a| error management;

653 a| aggression;

700 1 a| Schoemann, Alexander M.,e| degree supervisor.?| UNAUTHORIZED;

710 2 a| East Carolina University.b| Department of Psychology.?| UNAUTHORIZED;

856 40 z| Access via ScholarShipu| http://hdl.handle.net/10342/12834;

949 o| wjh;

994 a| C0b| ERE;

596 a| 1 4;

998 a| 6143756;

999 a| CLICK ON WEB ADDRESSw| ASISc| 1i| 6143756-1001l| JNETm| JOYNERr| Ys| Yt| JNE3ETDu| 6/9/2023x| ETDz| JERESOURCE;

999 a| CLICK ON WEB ADDRESSw| ASISc| 1i| 6143756-2001l| HSLELECm| HSLr| Ys| Yt| HEETDu| 6/9/2023x| ETDz| HERESOURCE;

Employee error : the development, validation, and use of a perceived error measure for predicting rumination, burnout, and counterproductive work behaviors / by Anne C. Carroll.

Author/creator	Carroll, Anne C. author.
Other author	Schoemann, Alexander M., degree supervisor.
Other author	East Carolina University. Department of Psychology.
Format	Theses and dissertations
Publication	[Greenville, N.C.] : [East Carolina University], 2023.
Description	1 online resource (93 pages)
Supplemental Content	Access via ScholarShip
Subjects	Industrial hygiene. Burn out (Psychology)--Prevention. Organizational behavior.

Variant title	Employee error the development, validation, and use of a perceived error measure for predicting rumination, burnout, and counterproductive work behaviors
Summary	Errors are ubiquitous in organizations. Nonetheless, scholarly literature regarding workplace error has largely focused on low-rate catastrophic failures such as the Challenger, Columbia, and Chernobyl accidents. However, errors are not always large in scale nor rare. A general measure of perceived error will be useful for industries that want to understand the relationship between employee error and important job-related outcomes such as rumination, burnout, and counterproductive work behaviors (CWBs). In order to better understand this area, we created and validated a perceived error scale (PES) on a general population of full-time workers. Study one consisted of 440 observations collected via MTurk. An exploratory factor analysis was conducted on 60 percent of the data, and a confirmatory factor analysis was conducted on the remaining sample. Based on psychometric analysis, we determined that perceptions of error were consistent with three established categories of error: individual, latent, and planning errors. Study two utilized a cross-sectional design consisting of 314 observations. SEM was used in this study to test a sequential mediation model. The results suggested that how an individual perceives error may impact rumination, burnout, and CWBs. Both the relationship between latent errors and CWBs were mediated by rumination and burnout. Similarly, the relationship between individual errors and CWB was mediated by rumination and burnout. Planning errors were not related to any of the downstream variables in the model. This is consistent with goal progress theory and the stressor-emotion model of CWB. Notably, the PES factor structure was replicated in the second study adding to its reliability evidence. Future research may consider taking a more longitudinal approach to measuring perceptions of error, burnout, rumination, and CWBs.
General note	Advisor: Alexander M. Schoemann
General note	Title from PDF t.p. (viewed September 3, 2024).
Dissertation note	Ph.D. East Carolina University 2023.
Dissertation note	Presented to the Faculty of the Department of Psychology
Bibliography note	Includes bibliographical references.
Technical details	System requirements: Adobe Reader.
Technical details	Mode of access: World Wide Web.

Employee error : the development, validation, and use of a perceived error measure for predicting rumination, burnout, and counterproductive work behaviors / by Anne C. Carroll.

Click here for more information about this title