Tools

LEADER 03629nam 22005658i 4500

001 ssj0002326330;

003 WaSeSS;

005 20251212090320.0;

006 m d ;

007 cr n ;

008 200227s2020 nyu sb 001 0 eng d;

010 a| 2020010395;

020 a| 9780367135645q| (hbk);

020 a| 9780367135652q| (pbk);

020 z| 9781003055259q| (ebk);

020 z| 9781000093193q| (adobe pdf);

020 z| 9781000093254q| (epub);

020 z| 9781000093223q| (mobi);

035 a| (WaSeSS)ssj0002326330;

040 a| DLCb| engc| DLCd| WaSeSS;

042 a| pcc;

049 a| EREEa| NEHH;

050 00 a| BJ1031b| .C73 2020;

082 00 a| 170/.422| 23;

100 1 a| Craig, William Lane.=| ^A115642;

245 12 a| A debate on God and moralityh| [electronic resource] :b| what is the best account of objective moral values and duties? /c| William Lane Craig and Erik J. Wielenberg ; edited by Adam Lloyd Johnson.;

260 a| New York, NY :b| Routledge,c| 2020.;

263 a| 2006;

300 a| pages cm;

504 a| Includes bibliographical references and index.;

506 a| Available only to authorized users.;

520 a| "In 2018, William Lane Craig and Erik J. Wielenberg participated in a debate at North Carolina State University, addressing the question: "God and Morality: What is the best account of objective moral values and duties?" Craig argued that theism provides a sound foundation for objective morality whereas atheism does not. Wielenberg countered that morality can be objective even if there is no God. This book includes the full debate, as well as endnotes with extended discussions that were not included in the debate. It also includes five chapters by other philosophers who have written substantive responses to the debate - J. P. Moreland, David Baggett, Mark Linville, Wes Morriston, and Michael Huemer. The book provides crucial resources for better understanding moral realism and its dependence on, or independence from, theistic foundations. Key features a valuable debate about whether or not God is the best explanation for objective morality, bringing together theists and atheists working on the same subject who normally are not in conversation with each other. Includes clear coverage of ontological and epistemological issues in metaethical theories, focusing on Divine Command Theory and Non-natural Robust Moral Realism. Engaging and accessible throughout, making the book well suited for undergraduate and seminary classrooms"--c| Provided by publisher.;

538 a| Mode of access: World Wide Web;

650 0 a| Ethics.=| ^A116;

650 0 a| God.=| ^A18012;

650 0 a| Theism.=| ^A29723;

650 0 a| Atheism.=| ^A15596;

650 0 a| Moral realism.=| ^A525212;

655 0 a| Electronic books.=| ^A491897;

700 1 a| Wielenberg, Erik J.q| (Erik Joseph),d| 1972-=| ^A593516;

700 1 a| Johnson, Adam Lloyd.?| UNAUTHORIZED;

856 40 z| Full text available from Taylor & Francis eBooksu| https://go.openathens.net/redirector/ecu.edu?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.taylorfrancis.com%2Fbooks%2F9781003055259;

949 a| CLICK ON WEB ADDRESSw| ASISh| JOYNER188;

949 a| CLICK ON WEB ADDRESSw| ASISh| HSL77;

949 a| CLICK ON WEB ADDRESSw| ASISh| JMUSIC60;

596 a| 1 3 4;

998 a| 6662961;

999 a| CLICK ON WEB ADDRESSw| ASISc| 1i| 6662961-1001l| JNETm| JOYNERr| Ys| Yt| JNESSBKu| 12/19/2025x| EBOOKz| JERESOURCE;

999 a| CLICK ON WEB ADDRESSw| ASISc| 1i| 6662961-2001l| HSLELECm| HSLr| Ys| Yt| HEBKu| 12/19/2025x| EBOOKz| HERESOURCE;

999 a| CLICK ON WEB ADDRESSw| ASISc| 1i| 6662961-3001l| MNETm| JMUSICr| Ys| Yt| MNESSBKu| 12/19/2025x| EBOOKz| JERESOURCE;

A debate on God and morality what is the best account of objective moral values and duties? / William Lane Craig and Erik J. Wielenberg ; edited by Adam Lloyd Johnson.

Author/creator	Craig, William Lane
Other author	Wielenberg, Erik J. (Erik Joseph), 1972-
Other author	Johnson, Adam Lloyd.
Format	Electronic
Publication Info	New York, NY : Routledge, 2020.
Description	pages cm
Supplemental Content	Full text available from Taylor & Francis eBooks
Subjects	Ethics. God. Theism. Atheism. Moral realism.

Abstract	"In 2018, William Lane Craig and Erik J. Wielenberg participated in a debate at North Carolina State University, addressing the question: "God and Morality: What is the best account of objective moral values and duties?" Craig argued that theism provides a sound foundation for objective morality whereas atheism does not. Wielenberg countered that morality can be objective even if there is no God. This book includes the full debate, as well as endnotes with extended discussions that were not included in the debate. It also includes five chapters by other philosophers who have written substantive responses to the debate - J. P. Moreland, David Baggett, Mark Linville, Wes Morriston, and Michael Huemer. The book provides crucial resources for better understanding moral realism and its dependence on, or independence from, theistic foundations. Key features a valuable debate about whether or not God is the best explanation for objective morality, bringing together theists and atheists working on the same subject who normally are not in conversation with each other. Includes clear coverage of ontological and epistemological issues in metaethical theories, focusing on Divine Command Theory and Non-natural Robust Moral Realism. Engaging and accessible throughout, making the book well suited for undergraduate and seminary classrooms"-- Provided by publisher.
Bibliography note	Includes bibliographical references and index.
Access restriction	Available only to authorized users.
Technical details	Mode of access: World Wide Web
Genre/form	Electronic books.
LCCN	2020010395
ISBN	9780367135645 (hbk)
ISBN	9780367135652 (pbk)
ISBN	(ebk)
ISBN	(adobe pdf)
ISBN	(epub)
ISBN	(mobi)

A debate on God and morality what is the best account of objective moral values and duties? / William Lane Craig and Erik J. Wielenberg ; edited by Adam Lloyd Johnson.

Click here for more information about this title