The actual art of governing Justice Robert H. Jackson's concurring opinion in the steel seizure case / Gerard N. Magliocca.

Abstract "Justice Robert H. Jackson's concurrence in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Company v. Sawyer (also called the Steel Seizure Case) is widely considered one of the greatest judicial opinions ever written. In Youngstown, the Supreme Court held that President Harry S. Truman acted illegally by seizing the nation's steel mills during the Korean War to avert a strike that would shut down production. Justice Jackson's separate opinion agreeing with that decision is now the authoritative source on the constitutional boundary between congressional and executive authority and is the spine of many leading cases such as United States v. Nixon and Trump v. United States"-- Provided by publisher.
Bibliography noteIncludes bibliographical references and index.
Access restrictionAvailable only to authorized users.
Technical detailsMode of access: World Wide Web
Genre/formElectronic books.
LCCN 2025019925
ISBN9780197768532 hardback
ISBNepub

Availability

Library Location Call Number Status Item Actions
Electronic Resources Access Content Online ✔ Available